The Extent of Medication Errors During Hajj in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Background Medication errors are frequently identified in healthcare institutions and pose a risk to patients. The mass gathering during Hajj may expose the pilgrims to numerous health risks. No study has reported the extent of medication errors during Hajj in Saudi Arabia. We investigated the rate, nature, reporting, severity, and causes of medication errors in Hajj pilgrims. Methodology A retrospective analysis of medication errors reported by healthcare professionals was conducted from July 5, 2022, to July 15, 2022, at Mina Al Wadi Hospital, Saudi Arabia. This study included all medication error report forms collected during the Hajj season. The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Index was used to classify the severity of medication errors. Results There were reports of 43 medication errors in 3,210 prescriptions. The medication error incidence rate was 1.5% (43/3,210). The highest proportion of medication errors (83.72%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 72.69-94.75) occurred during the prescribing phase, and 97% (95% CI = 93.16-100.0) of medication errors were classified as near misses. Wrong drugs (23.25%) and frequency (18.60%) were responsible for nearly half of the medication errors. Lack of drug information was the leading cause of reported medication errors (58.14%), followed by environmental, personnel, and workload issues (23.25%), and look-alike/sound-alike medication issues (18.60%). Conclusions This study found that the incidence of medication errors was consistent with the global standard, and many of them did not reach pilgrims and were preventable. This highlights the importance of targeted interventions. Incorrect medication was the common type of medication error, highlighting a crucial area for intervention and improvement. Lack of drug information was the primary underlying factor in the occurrence of medication errors. Pharmacists were more likely than other healthcare professionals to report medication errors, highlighting the importance of their involvement in improving medication safety among pilgrims. Future research needs to focus on examining the effectiveness of interventions (e.g., provision of education regarding medicines and medication review) in reducing medicine-related events during Hajj.

The effectiveness of psychological interventions for reducing PTSD and psychological distress in first responders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: First responders are faced with stressful and traumatic events in their work that may affect their psychological health. The current review examined the effectiveness of psychological interventions to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, stress and burnout in first responders. METHODS: Four databases were searched to identify controlled studies that examined the efficacy of psychological interventions to reduce PTSD symptoms (primary outcome) in first responders (including firefighters, police/law enforcement officers, search and rescue personnel, emergency and paramedics teams). Secondary outcomes were anxiety, depression, burnout, and stress. RESULTS: 15 studies were identified, including 10 studies that measured PTSD, 7 studies for anxiety, 10 studies for depression, 7 studies for stress and 1 for burnout. Interventions were associated with a significant reduction in PTSD (SDM = -0.86; 95% CI = -1.34 -- 0.39), depression (SDM = -0.63; 95% CI = -0.94 --0.32), and anxiety (SDM = -0.38; 95% CI = -0.71 --0.05) but not stress (SDM = -0.13; 95% CI = -0.51-0.25). CBT-based and clinician-delivered interventions were associated with significantly greater reductions in PTSD than other types of interventions and non-clinician interventions, but no differences were found for depression. There was evidence of moderate to high risk of bias across all studies. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological interventions are effective in reducing PTSD, depression and anxiety symptoms but not stress in first responders. Further research is needed using high quality randomised designs over longer periods of follow-up.

Surgeon burnout, impact on patient safety and professionalism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews have found high burnout in healthcare professionals is associated with poorer patient care. However, no review or meta-analysis has investigated this association in surgeons specifically. The present study addressed this gap, by examining the association between surgeon burnout and 1) patient safety and 2) surgical professionalism. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included original empirical studies that measured burnout and patient care or professionalism in surgeons. Six databases were searched (PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Database, CINAHL, and Web of Science) from inception to February 2021. An adapted version of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess study quality. Meta-analysis and narrative synthesis were utilised to synthesise results. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the narrative review (including 27,248 participants) and nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. Burnout was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of involvement in medical error (OR = 2.51, 95% Cl [1.68-3.72]). The professionalism outcome variables were too diverse for meta-analysis, however, the narrative synthesis indicated a link between high burnout and a higher risk of loss of temper and malpractice suits and lower empathy. No link was found between burnout and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: There is a significant association between higher burnout in surgeons and poorer patient safety. The delivery of interventions to reduce surgeon burnout should be prioritised; such interventions should be evaluated for their potential to produce concomitant improvements in patient safety.